Europeans and Technology: Attitudes and Strategic Implications
The European Tech Insights 2025 report, released by the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, analyzes Europeans’ attitudes toward rapid technological change and its social and geopolitical implications. The findings are based on a survey of more than 3,000 adults across 10 EU countries. The report’s main conclusions suggest that citizens support technological progress—but not at any price—with strong demands for safety, democratic oversight, inclusion, and the preservation of social values. Strategic autonomy and economic security are gaining prominence among citizens’ priorities, who are increasingly willing to prioritize resilience over efficiency.
Main takeaways of the report:
- Europeans embrace technological progress, but not at any price. Even though competitiveness features prominently in Europe’s political agenda, only 22% see it as the top technological priority, compared with 42% who prioritise safety and resilience and 36% who place inclusion first. The same pattern appears in AI investment: 71% would rather channel public funds into education or healthcare. For citizens, technological progress is expected to reinforce social welfare rather than compete with it.
- Aligned with the US, yet increasingly open to China. While a majority still favour alignment with the United States, support for China has increased by 15 points since 2023.
- Strategic autonomy emerges as a core public priority. Survey results point to a clear demand to strengthen Europe’s technological sovereignty and security, even above economic convenience or global openness.
- Almost half of Europeans would accept higher defence spending even if it required cuts in social budgets.
- 63% prefer security-related technologies manufactured in Europe, even at a higher cost, and 40% would pay more for tech products to reduce dependence on China.
- 72% want sensitive data stored exclusively on European servers, and 70% would support restricting the export of sensitive technologies to rival countries.
- AI: cautious enthusiasm and rising scepticism. European citizens reject delegating critical functions to AI systems:
- 77% oppose its use in early childhood education.
- 81% would not entrust their personal finances to algorithms.
- 90% would rather have a human manager than an artificial one.
- Concerns about cultural homogenisation, technological dependence and impacts on social cohesion are rising across demographic groups.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.