From Stability to Competitiveness: Rethinking Regulation and Supervision
The report “Europe’s Competitiveness at Crossroads”, prepared by The European House- Ambrosseti, assesses how the recommendations of the Draghi and Letta reports (2024) have been taken up by EU policymakers, providing proposals to close the gap between initial ambition and effective delivery. In its view, despite strong political momentum, progress remains slow and fragmented, with Single Market barriers and regulatory complexity still holding back competitiveness. A central theme in the report is the regulatory burden, with particular focus on the financial system and sustainability frameworks. Beyond the simplification efforts already underway, the report highlights a proposal, first introduced in the UK, that could serve as a model for the EU: establishing a secondary objective for regulators and supervisors, centred on growth and competitiveness. This, it argues, would help ensure that regulation fosters economic development without undermining financial stability.
- Banking regulation and supervision are central to competitiveness:
- Two-thirds of corporate debt in the EU is financed through banks, compared with only 20% in the US, amplifying the effect of prudential rules on the real economy. The implementation of Basel requirements, along with additional complementary supervisory layers (additional Level 2 and Level 3 requirements), has strengthened stability but constrained banks’ ability to expand lending, particularly to SMEs and scale-ups.
- According to the report, the EU’s supervisory and regulatory framework has materially increased capital and compliance requirements for credit institutions affecting the cost and availability of finance for firms, particularly SMEs and scale-ups that are more dependent on bank lending than on capital markets. Higher capital demands and complex prudential standards shape credit pricing, especially in sectors exposed to the energy transition or technological uncertainty, limiting investment, slowing innovation and reducing firms’ ability to scale globally.
- To address this situation, the report highlights a proposal, already implemented in UK, where financial supervisor is subject to secondary statutory objectives such as fostering economic growth, international competitiveness, or facilitating competition and innovation. Such goals are legally subordinated to the primary objective of safety and soundness but nonetheless provide a normative framework to guide the regulator’s broader conduct. “A secondary goal for regulators and supervisors, focusing on growth and competitiveness, which should allow for ensuring growth without sacrificing financial stability”.
- Sustainability reporting and due diligence (CSRD and CS3D/CSDDD) have also become decisive factors for competitiveness, where compliance costs may determine whether companies expand or are held back. To ease the burden, the European Commission introduced the Omnibus I package (February 2025), which:
- Postpones application deadlines for CSRD and CS3D, giving firms more time to adapt.
- Narrows the CSRD’s scope to large companies (over 1,000 employees and financial thresholds), exempting around 80% of firms, and introduces a voluntary SME standard (VSME).
- Simplifies obligations by removing sector-specific standards, reducing assurance requirements, limiting the “trickle-down effect” on SMEs, and aligning CSRD and CS3D to avoid duplication.
- Adjusts CS3D by restricting full due diligence to direct business partners unless risks are evident, extending review intervals, and removing the EU-wide liability regime in favor of national frameworks.
Filter results
According to Ramón Casilda, “it is no longer just a matter of Spanish capital investing in Latin America, but also of Latin American capital using Spain as a European base,” reinforcing a more balanced transatlantic economic space.
According to José Carlos Díez, Professor of Economics at the University of Alcalá, Spanish households have access to some of the cheapest mortgages in Europe, with interest rates below both Euribor and long-term government bond yields.
According to the IEE, Spain's business tax burden exceeds the European Union average, both as a share of total tax revenues and as a percentage of GDP.
AEB, CECA and UNACC propose measures to increase banks' lending capacity by more than €2 trillion in the euro area, including over €250 billion in Spain, providing additional resources to strengthen banks and finance new investment.
According to Boston Consulting Group, regulation brought in after the GFC strengthened the financial sector’s resilience but institutionalized bias towards removing all risk over economic growth.
According to Ramón Casilda, the EU–Mercosur agreement will generate annual tariff savings of around €4 billion, which is significantly higher than the savings expected under the agreements with Canada and Japan.
Economist José Carlos Díez notes that Spain’s banking sector has an excess of deposits and sufficient liquidity to meet the credit demand of companies and households, and does so at the lowest interest rates in Europe, according to the ECB.
According to CEPS, regulatory and supervisory complexity acts as a structural constraint on integration, investment and market depth, with costs that weigh most heavily on smaller institutions, new entrants and cross-border business models.
According to the ECB, an efficient, secure and integrated payment system would strengthen the international role of the euro and deliver benefits such as lower financing costs, reduced exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and greater protection against sanctions.
According to the IEA one key debate in the EU on financial regulation simplification is whether to explicitly include competitiveness, efficiency or contribution to growth as objectives of the regulatory agencies, following the UK example.
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.