Potential financial risks due to high levels of public debt and structurally higher interest rates
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) points out that high levels of global public debt, in both advanced and emerging economies, could pose risks to financial stability if more decisive fiscal measures are not taken to ensure its sustainability. According to the IMF’s estimates, public debt as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) has increased significantly in recent years and will continue to rise to levels of 120% in advanced economies and 80% in emerging and middle-income economies by 2028, against a backdrop of lower economic growth and higher interest rates going forward.
Key takeaways:
- Higher interest rates, higher cost of debt servicing going forward: Public debt as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) has increased significantly in recent years (according to the IMF, it could reach levels of 120% in advanced economies and 80% in emerging and middle-income economies by 2028) against a backdrop of very low interest rates. However, according to IMF estimates, the new normal going forward will be higher interest rates and lower economic growth, which will increase states’ financial burden. These are a few reasons why real interest rates will remain high:
- Central banks continue to fight inflation, which will produce rate volatility for some time.
- The normalization of central bank balance sheets (commonly referred to as quantitative tightening) may lead to an oversupply of long-term fixed income securities in the market that were previously absorbed by central bank balance sheets, implying higher interest rates for new debt issues.
- In countries with expansionary fiscal policies and high inflation, central banks could maintain high rates to achieve their objectives.
- Central banks continue to fight inflation, which will produce rate volatility for some time.
- Bank-sovereign risk nexus: The higher the level of debt, the greater the possibility of banks’ balance sheets having more exposure to public debt, which in a scenario of financial stress could cause risks to financial stability in two ways:
- States with more debt and higher primary deficits will have less capacity to support banks in difficulty.
- Banks with greater exposure on their balance sheets to public debt will be impacted more by the sovereign fiscal fragility that could arise with potential negative impacts on profitability and capital.
- States with more debt and higher primary deficits will have less capacity to support banks in difficulty.
In conclusion, according to the IMF, countries should begin a path of fiscal consolidation, and build room for maneuver while financial conditions are relatively accommodative and the labor market remains strong.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.