The Center for the Governance of Change of the IE Business School has released a report in which it compares the university training (more than 500,000 degree programs) with the labor demand (more than 13 million job offers) in the United Kingdom, Spain and Denmark. According to the report some universities are up to eight times better aligned with labor markets than others, which could explain some inefficiencies in the labor markets and makes necessary a better matching of the university skills to the national job markets, even more in the current environment of economy digitalization.
According to the report, job skills are changing dramatically, "depending on the sector, between 10–50% of jobs require different skills than those required for the same positions 10 years ago". For this reason, it is necessary to align the skills provided in universities with the new needs of a more digital and automated economy, in which new jobs appear and others disappear or change and require different skills.
The conclusions of the analysis show how the curricular plan of some universities (generally with less than 50 years of history and private) would be up to 8 times more aligned with the skills requested in job offers than that of others, “placing some students at a significant disadvantage” when it comes to finding employment and would also explain "why there are highly paid jobs that are in high demand but go unfilled”.
The report offers a number of notable insights and data:
Filter results
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.
According to Ramón Casilda Béjar, Spain, in today’s complex geopolitical landscape, has the opportunity to strengthen its role as a bridge and connecting country between Ibero-America and the European Union, revitalizing investment flows in both directions.
According to @ECB, in moments of acute stress, the public often turns to physical currency as a reliable store of value and a resilient means of payment, underscoring the crucial role it plays above and beyond everyday transactional convenience
According to Juan S. Mora-Sanguinetti, in Spain a 10% increase in regulatory volume leads to a 0.5% drop in employment in companies with fewer than 10 employees.
According to Hélène Rey “In a world where stablecoins, particularly those pegged to the dollar, become an important global payment tool, we must brace ourselves for substantial consequences”.
@judith_arnal proposes reforms for the EU to advance regulatory simplification, starting with consensus on its meaning, with competitiveness as a pillar, plus coordination mechanisms and a governance rethink.