War in Ukraine: How to finance higher fiscal spending? through taxes or public debt?
Report published by the Peterson Institute for International Economics analyzing the economic effects of the war in Europe and the responses from the perspective of fiscal and monetary policy in the different EU countries in the form of direct aid, tax cuts on energy prices, subsidies... The report analyses what would be the best way to finance this increase in public spending, opting for public debt at a time when uncertainty can take its toll on domestic demand and there is substantial room to run temporary larger deficits if needed.
Report Highlights:
- Fiscal policy measures: The war in Europe is going to lead to an increase in public spending due to higher expenditure on defence, refugees, the need to invest in infrastructure and energy autonomy, and the support to the corporates and households most affected by the war and the rise in energy prices. So far, these public support measures could be grouped into the following categories:
- Temporary reduction of taxes on energy consumption: This measure has been the most widespread to date, and for example has led to reductions from 15 cents per litre of gasoline in France to 30 cents in Germany.
- Direct grants: Cash transfers of a fixed amount to individuals or companies to deal with the effects of inflation and war. They can be universal regardless of their consumption of food, fuel or gas, or more specific aimed at the most vulnerable and affected by price increases.
- Price regulations: For example, the plan of Spain and Portugal proposing a method to decouple gas from the calculation of the electricity price, or France requesting the country's main electricity company to limit the increase in the bill to 4% in 2022. According to the authors, these are not efficient measures in the long term, but they do protect the welfare state.
- Perverse effects of subsidies: The authors' main criticism of these public subsidies is that they would be encouraging energy consumption, transferring aid to producers ( i.e Russia).
- How to finance this public support? According to the authors, there are arguments in favour of creating a special tax on war “Putin tax”: it would not be as unpopular as in other circumstances and it would also underline the fact that war is not free. However, they are more favourable to financing through public debt as it is a more efficient mechanism to compensate for the weakness in consumption and investment expected in the EU due to the uncertainty and loss of income and purchasing power that is taking place. This measure should not call into question the sustainability of public debt in the future for various reasons: the 10-year benchmark bond rates have increased by 50 basis points only since the start of the war, an affordable cost, it is a temporary crisis, and public debt levels in a scenario of high inflation will likely fall in the next two years.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.