How to regulate telework to make it more efficient?
The Spain-based "think tank" Fedea has published a report with recommendations to improve the current regulation of telework. The benefits of telework for workers, companies and the economy as a whole are manifold, and it is desirable that some of these changes become permanent, making remote working a key element of the new labour market organisation. However, according to the authors, the current regulation, hastily introduced in the middle of the pandemic, establishes a complex framework, characterised by a dual regulation in which there are two very different regimes depending on whether or not teleworking time exceeds 30% of the quarterly working time.
Main conclusions of the report:
- The pre-Pandemic legislation left great freedom to the parties to design by mutual agreement this way of working under the principles of voluntariness and non-discrimination of the teleworker.
- The new regulation establishes a complex framework, characterized by a dual regulation in which there are two very different regimes depending on whether or not the teleworking time exceeds 30% of the quarterly working day.
- Below this threshold, telework is considered "unregulated" and is almost completely unregulated. Above this threshold, however, we enter the "regular" telework regime, which is subject to many restrictions that tend to increase its costs.
- In the authors' view, the risk of this dual regulation is that it tends to push telework just below the 30% threshold, not for efficiency reasons but to avoid regulation and save costs.
- To take advantage of the opportunities that telework offers, the authors propose to modify the current regulation to include the following basic principles:
- Recover a common regulation of teleworking subject to the principles of voluntariness, non-discrimination, adequate provision of company resources and compensation of costs to the worker.
- It is particularly important to eliminate the artificial 30% threshold that only manages to segment the market.
- Avoid that teleworking becomes essentially a way to reconcile work and thus increases gender segregation.
- Have a general regulation of company monitoring, time recording and digital disconnection.
- Maintain the specific regulations in force on occupational risk prevention.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.