A Digital Euro: The devil is in the detail
Speech by Fabio Panetta, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank (ECB), in which he analyzes the main reasons that have led the European Central Bank to work on the adoption of a digital euro and the unintended consequences that it could have on banking intermediation, financial stability and the international financial system “if it is not properly designed”.
According to him the main reason to support the issuance of a “digital euro” should be “to combine the safety of central bank money and the convenience of a digital means of payment in order to satisfy consumer preferences”. In relation to digital payments and the entry of non-financial competitors, such as the Big Techs, he affirms that “although digitization generates greater efficiency and lower costs, it can also pose risks for consumers and the financial sector”, paying special attention to the following questions:
- Misuse of personal information and lack of privacy in financial payments.
- Implementation of the “winner-takes-all model” encouraged by the big platforms could reduce competition in financial markets, limiting consumer choice.
- Digital and monetary Sovereignty: Dependence of technologies governed elsewhere could create systemic risks and even endanger monetary and digital sovereignty.
He also describes some potential unintended consequences that need to be addressed and carefully considered before issuing a “Digital euro”:
- In normal times it could create a risk of commercial banks disintermediation, as the “digital euro” could attract payments and deposits activity from banks, reducing their incomes and customer information related to such activity, which could lead to lower credit grant. Fabio Panetta clarifies that the ECB does not intend to interact directly with hundreds of millions of clients, it will provide safe money, but financial intermediaries (i.e commercial banks) will continue to offer their services to clients.
- In times of crisis it could pose risks to financial stability as a “digital euro” would give access to a safe liquid asset that could accelerate “digital runs” away from commercial banks.
- Impact on the international monetary system. A very liquid digital euro may lead to foreign investors using it disproportionately, amplifying international shocks. According to him the digital euro should be designed in a way that prevents it from being used as a form of investment. For that purpose he provides some ideas such as limiting the amount of digital euro individual users can hold or penalizing remuneration on individual users’ digital euro holdings above a certain threshold.
Filter results
Economist José Carlos Díez notes that Spain’s banking sector has an excess of deposits and sufficient liquidity to meet the credit demand of companies and households, and does so at the lowest interest rates in Europe, according to the ECB.
According to CEPS, regulatory and supervisory complexity acts as a structural constraint on integration, investment and market depth, with costs that weigh most heavily on smaller institutions, new entrants and cross-border business models.
According to the ECB, an efficient, secure and integrated payment system would strengthen the international role of the euro and deliver benefits such as lower financing costs, reduced exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and greater protection against sanctions.
According to the IEA one key debate in the EU on financial regulation simplification is whether to explicitly include competitiveness, efficiency or contribution to growth as objectives of the regulatory agencies, following the UK example.
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.