Assessing public measures in the face of inflation and the Ukrainian crisis
Funcas (the Spanish economic Think Tank) reviews the public measures of the main EU countries (Spain, France, Germany and Italy) to face the exponential increase in energy prices after the invasion of Ukraine. The application of tax reductions on energy, the application of subsidies to fuel consumption, or the reforms of the electricity price formation mechanism, when applied across the board, although they may be solution in the short term, they have a high budgetary cost and raise doubts about their effectiveness in the long term, while exacerbating the tension between the containment of inflation and the change of energy model.
- Public support measures aimed at controlling the rise in energy prices as the main source of inflation and limiting its effects on the most vulnerable groups. According to Funcas, the effectiveness of some of the initiatives, especially the non-targeted cuts in taxes or generalized subsidies to fuel consumption, is doubtful (although it has been applied by the four countries examined). All this raises the importance of a comprehensive plan to take over from the recent measures justified by the emergency situation.
- High budgetary impact: The resources deployed until the invasion of Ukraine amounted to between 5 and 16.4 billion of euros. Since then, the additional cost of the measures is between 15 billion of euros in Germany and 27 billion of euros in France.
- Four types of government measures analyzed: general fiscal measures that cut the final price of hydrocarbons; reforms aimed at altering the functioning of the market, especially the electricity market; subsidies or one-offs for specific groups (vulnerable and sectors most affected by energy increases); and actions aimed to save and increase energy efficiency or to promote alternative sources of supply.
- In the long term, most of the measures implemented in the four countries have no effect on the fight against inflation, with exceptions such as energy saving and efficiency measures (Germany has reduced public transport fares and Italy will make it compulsory to keep air conditioning above 25 degrees Celsius next summer).
- Compensation policies focused on the most vulnerable sectors are undoubtedly the most effective from the point of view of protecting the productive sector and social cohesion; but they do not have a direct impact on inflation, nor do they encourage structural adjustment.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.