Central Bank digital currencies: The devil will be in the details
Larissa de Lima and Douglas J. Elliott from Oliver Wyman recommend policymakers to avoid critical design and implementation errors on the issuance of digital currencies by Central Banks (CDBCs), as “there is strong momentum in key nations for central banks to create digital versions of their currencies for widespread use”.
According to the authors, this strong momentum for central banks to create digital versions of their currencies is consistent with the fact that China and Sweden are already in the experimentation phase, Bahamas has already its “digital sand dollar” and in Europe “Christine Lagarde is indicating a digital euro could be in use by 2025.” Faced with this situation, the authors propose several recommendations that should be considered by policymakers in the design and implementation of the CDBCs:
- Consider the big picture in the payments ecosystem: “CBDCs do not exist in isolation; policy regarding CBDCs, stablecoins, other digital assets, and the modernization of payments ecosystem must fit together coherently.” This task may be not easy as few countries, if any, have a single authority responsible of all the above categories. No coordination across the different parts of the payments ecosystem may have unintended consequences in the financial system.
- The design will be better and easier once the purpose is clear: CBDCs can be a powerful tool but central banks need to prioritize policy objectives and need to have a clear view on what they pursue with the issuance of a CDBC: it will be designed to replace the cash, to increase financial inclusion, to improve cross-border payments processes, to decrease fraud and illicit activity… At this point, and to carry out an efficient design and implementation, other questions must be answered, too: Who should have access to CBDCs? Will CBDC holders have a direct relationship with the central bank or will intermediaries, such as banks and Fintechs, be used? Will the system be account-based, token-based, or some combination? What limits will be in place for users and intermediaries? How will anonymity be preserved?…
- CBDCs issuances should bear in mind stakeholder’s views and be accompanied by a good communications plan as it will have a significant impact on the financial system and society. Central banks should involve finance ministries and financial regulators in the design and implementation but without undermining the independence of central banks in monetary policy. The authors highlight that this will be critical in regard to some decisions, for instance in the interest remuneration of CDBCs as “any significant difference between what banks pay on deposits and what CBDCs accrue is likely to provoke anger that the ‘people’s bank’ is treating citizens worse than the profit-seeking banks are”.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.