Climate change: causes vs financial impacts
Speech by Sam Woods, Bank of England´s Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation talking on recent tests on the UK’s largest banks and insurers on how prepared they are for financial risks caused by climate change. In its view, the role of prudential authorities is to ensure the financial system can withstand the financial risks arising from climate change but not to address directly the causes of climate change. That depends on decisions of governments and parliaments, not financial regulators.
Main conclusions of the speech:
- Climate change is now in the spotlight of prudential regulators around the world to ensure the safety and soundness of banks and insurers, so that they can continue to provide vital financial services to the real economy under any climate scenario. In this regard, the transition to net zero emissions will be a major challenge for our institutions and societies, and it will require substantial investments that without confidence in the basic functioning of the financial system would be almost impossible.
- Climate risk financial impact will be captured in capital requirements of financial institutions: capital requirements are one way of providing resilience against banks and insurers losses in the transition to Zero Emissions. But in his view, “it is not yet clear that the magnitude of transition costs require a fundamental recalibration of capital requirements for the system”.
- Financial regulators and capital requirements are not the best tool to directly address the causes of climate change as according to him “how to address the causes of climate change is a decision for governments and parliaments”.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.