Potential implications of the different climate change policies among countries
Gary Clyde Hufbauer, researcher at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, exposes in this article the need for an agreement between the three major economies (the United States, China and Europe) on how to reduce carbon emissions, bearing in mind that so far all of them have adopted different commitments and measures to that end. These divergencies could lead to an increase in protectionist policies, trade wars, and competitive disadvantages that obstruct cooperative action needed to reduce global emissions.
According to the article, the United States, Europe and China "are at loggerheads over how to reduce reliance on fossil fuels without excessively disadvantaging their own economies" and this divergence is leading them to make different proposals and commitments to reduce carbon emissions and could eventually translate into political and economic conflicts between them:
- The European Union and the United States have released border tax proposals to imported products that do not comply with the new environmental standards, not only because they go against efforts to reduce global emissions, but also because they could potentially harm their domestic industry. However, both proposals differ in the calculation of the amount to be applied -based on the price of carbon emissions- and on the date to be implemented.
- For its part, China, in addition to opposing the new taxes proposed by the EU and the United States, has launched a carbon trading market last July, whose initial phase covers 2,225 power plants, but leaves out other sectors intensive in emissions (chemical, aluminum...) that would be incorporated later. It has also announced plans to launch mandatory climate-related disclosure requirements both for banks and other listed companies.
- The new border tax proposals to reduce carbon emissions have received numerous critics: they are considered protectionist measures against free trade and might trigger unilateral measures in the rest of the countries, causing international trade friction and, ultimately, preventing the necessary cooperation in the fight against climate change.
- To avoid this situation, the author proposes that the World Trade Organization should create an expert body to calculate (and periodically update) the amount of these new taxes on imports based on the environmental standards of each country, and a two-year moratorium to reach an international political agreement.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.