Recovery and Resilience facility will lead to lower usage of other EU Funds
Jorge Núñez Ferrer, Senior Research Fellow, and Tomás Ruiz de la Ossa, Research Assistant at the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), analysed the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience facility (RRF) and their interaction with other European funds. In their view, there is a growing probability that the RRF will be prioritised to the detriment of other European funds such as cohesion and React-EU funds, among others, whose execution rate to date is going below expectations. Governments have to choose which funds to use due to their limited implementation capacity, which will result in final usage below the total available funds.
Main takeaways from the article:
- Member States have limited administrative capacity to execute funds and they won´t execute total funds available: The article analyzes the low level of implementation of cohesion funds by countries, both in the past and in the current program 2021-2027, which surprisingly is practically unused. It also analyzes the implementation of the React EU funds, whose access and financial conditions are more attractive for countries. Although their usage is extremely heterogeneous by countries, Spain and Italy (the countries benefited with the highest amounts of RRF funds) will be well below the average.
- Member states are focused on the implementation of RRF: The administrative burden to use EU Funds makes governments to prioritize the usage of RRF funds. Not only because is less onerous to spend than cohesion funds without national co-financing, but it is also in the political limelight. Regarding lower administrative burden, the article points out that an important difference was that the RRF was based on achieving milestones rather than ex-ante detailed project-based programming. However, the mistrust between Member States soon led to rigid ex-ante financial pre-allocation controls, which have delayed the approval of plans, slowed down deployment and reduced flexibility.
- Looking forward the article suggests that Member States need to increase flexibility of EU funds: Conditions to access funds should move away from rigid pre-allocation and the ‘specification’ principle that ringfences funding for programmes and projects. They should focus more on achieving milestones, which would represent a move towards a system which covers expenditures as reimbursements, as is partially the case for the RRF. In the future, a system that could be considered is the one that provides EU loans that can eventually transform into grants, but only if objectives are achieved.
Filter results
According to IE University’s Center for the Governance of Change, deeper and more integrated financial markets would strengthen the euro’s global role. This requires, among other elements, resilient and interoperable payment systems and completing the banking union.
Partnerships between banks and private credit: The winners will be those that combine bank underwriting discipline, distribution, and customer access with private capital’s appetite for long-dated, illiquid risk, according to Oliver Wyman.
Lucrezia Reichlin (CEPR): A CBDC is not a prerequisite for monetary sovereignty. Confusing money with payments can risk misdiagnosing the problem and misaligning economic policy efforts.
According to the World Economic Forum´s Global Risk Report 2026, geoeconomic confrontation, mis- and disinformation and societal polarization make up the top three short-term risks, while environmental risks dominate in the long term.
According to the World Economic Forum, over the last few years AI has moved from experimentation to workflow integration, promising systemic gains in productivity while also raising critical questions around economic inclusion, values, trust and resilience.
According to AFME, a clearer, more coherent, and proportionate regulatory environment, without unnecessary layers and focuses on growth and competitiveness, is keyl to increase investor confidence, unlock private capital and deepen European capital markets
According to the Center for the Governance of Change at IE University, Europeans support technological progress if it reinforces security, inclusion, and social welfare; but resist it when change feels imposed, opaque, or misaligned with their values.
According to a recent report released by CEPS, European financial regulators should adopt competitiveness as a formal secondary objective, following the precedent established by the UK's Financial Services and Markets Act 2023.
According to the OECD. SMEs and start-ups that grow rapidly contribute significantly to job creation, economic growth and competitiveness. Indeed, SMEs that grow by one-third over a three-year period, contribute about as much to job creation as large firms.
According to @McKinsey, banks must prepare for a new growth curve. Strategic precision —the ability to combine technology, capital discipline, and deep customer insight— will distinguish the leaders from the laggards.
According to Kristalina Georgeva IMF Managing Director, lifting growth requires three things: one, regulatory housecleaning to unleash private enterprise; two, deeper regional integration; and three, preparedness to harness AI.
According to The European House – Ambrosetti, the European Union has an opportunity to boost competitiveness and growth by simplifying regulatory and supervisory frameworks, particularly in the areas of sustainability and the financial sector.